Dog Bite Attorney in St. Louis, Missouri

Dog Bite Statistics

The CDC has conducted significant testing on the rate of fatalities involving dogs. The study examined the breeds of dogs who were involved in fatalities. This study indicated that the following breeds were the most likely to be involved in a fatality:

• Pure Bred Pit Bull

• Pure Bred Rottweiler

• Pure Bred German Shepard

• Pure Bred Husky

In Missouri, the owner of the dog that bites the injured party is strictly liable for the injuries sustained. Critically, dog bite owners will still be held strictly liable even if the dog has never been bitten before. Typically, dog owners have insurance policies that cover any damages to a party injured by the dog.

Insurance Company Tactics

In the event that you are injured by a dog bite, you will inevitably have to deal with an insurance company. When dealing with an insurance company, it is important to note the following:

Insurance companies are not on your side.

When insurance companies find out about a potential dog bite claim, they will contact you immediately. They will ask you to provide a statement of what happened and they will ask you to provide them with all of your medical records and bills related to the accident. At first, these insurance companies will appear to be on your side and may come across as someone who is trying to help you get through your injury. Despite this, after complying with all of their demands, the insurance company will offer you a settlement which is substantially inadequate. Most of the time, the offer doesn’t even cover your medical bills, let alone your pain and suffering.

Comparative Fault

Insurance companies will employ many different tactics to try to convince you that your claim isn’t what you think it is. One of these tactics is to tell the injured party that they contributed to the accident. This is called comparative fault.

Comparative fault is a doctrine recognized by Missouri law that essentially allows fault or blame to be placed upon the injured party. Specifically, juries are told that if they see fit, they may assign a percentage of fault to an injured party based on the facts of the case. For example, a jury may find that an injured party’s actions, although not the main reason, still contributed to the dog bite and as such will assign fault to the injured party. This assignment of fault will reduce your award in proportion to the percentage assigned.

Insurance companies are well aware of this doctrine and will oftentimes abuse this doctrine in an attempt to make the injured party believe they played a role in the accident. Insurance companies will make a determination for themselves as to what percentage of blame is to be placed upon the injured driver. Despite following all applicable rules and regulations, insurance companies simply think being cut off by another driver is the injured party’s fault. Of course, this doesn’t follow simple logic, but that is how insurance companies think.

Why You Need to Hire a Lawyer

When an attorney gets involved in a dog bite claim, insurance companies take notice. They begin to realize that they can no longer take advantage of an injured person who is in a bad situation. Insurance companies know that an attorney has the ability and resources to properly investigate an accident. Likewise, an attorney understands all the facets of a personal injury claim giving you a distinct advantage against the insurance company. All in all, when an attorney gets involved, the insurance company knows that the injured party means business.

What We Can Do For You

The Law Office of Steve Slough routinely handles dog bite cases. The firm prides itself on standing up to insurance companies and fighting for construction accident victims. We have experience in dealing with insurance companies and know how to quickly discredit the theories they use to deny your claim.

If you have been injured due to a dog bite, please feel free to call our office for a free consultation.